法律图书馆>>法治动态>>全文
离职后,员工名下的网红账号归谁?(3)
<P style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; WIDOWS: 2; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); LIST-STYLE-TYPE: none; FONT-STYLE: normal; TEXT-INDENT: 0px; MARGIN: 0px 0px 1em; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; WHITE-SPACE: normal; ORPHANS: 2; LETTER-SPACING: normal; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 16px; FONT-WEIGHT: 400; WORD-SPACING: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial">  李琳不服一审判决,上诉至上海一中院。
<P style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; WIDOWS: 2; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); LIST-STYLE-TYPE: none; FONT-STYLE: normal; TEXT-INDENT: 0px; MARGIN: 0px 0px 1em; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; WHITE-SPACE: normal; ORPHANS: 2; LETTER-SPACING: normal; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 16px; FONT-WEIGHT: 400; WORD-SPACING: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial">  二审:涉案账号的使用权应归公司
<P style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; WIDOWS: 2; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); LIST-STYLE-TYPE: none; FONT-STYLE: normal; TEXT-INDENT: 0px; MARGIN: 0px 0px 1em; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; WHITE-SPACE: normal; ORPHANS: 2; LETTER-SPACING: normal; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 16px; FONT-WEIGHT: 400; WORD-SPACING: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial">  李琳上诉称,涉案账号以个人身份信息实名注册,由自己掌握密码实际控制,账号运营由其自主决定,并非是工作劳动成果,公司对账号主张权利没有法律依据。
<P style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; WIDOWS: 2; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); LIST-STYLE-TYPE: none; FONT-STYLE: normal; TEXT-INDENT: 0px; MARGIN: 0px 0px 1em; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; WHITE-SPACE: normal; ORPHANS: 2; LETTER-SPACING: normal; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 16px; FONT-WEIGHT: 400; WORD-SPACING: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial">  法官认为,本案的争议焦点在于:一、李琳注册账号是否为职务行为?二、账号价值是否因完成工作任务形成?三、李琳人身属性是否与账号不可分?


总共6页  [1] [2] 3 [4] [5] [6] 
上一页  下一页  

法律图书馆>>法治动态