法律图书馆>>新法规速递>>正文
2012年中国法院知识产权司法保护状况(英文)(10)
  
   Continued extending the boundaries of the intellectual property-related adjudication function to answer the demands of economic and social development
   In July, to leverage the adjudicatory function as a means to intensify reform of the of scientific & technological institutions and for accelerating the establishment of a national system of innovation, SPC publish the Opinions on Leveraging the Adjudicatory Function to Provide Judicial Safeguards for Deepening the Reform of Scientific & Technological Institutions and for Accelerating the Establishment of a National System of Innovation. The Opinions noted that the people’s courts should improve upon their understanding and their sense of responsibility and of mission in providing judicial protection to serve the said objectives. The Opinions also pointed out that outcomes of intellectual endeavours should be given better protection to spur indigenous innovation and technological transcendence, that new factors should receive allocated rationally and according to law to align science and technology with social and economic development, and that centralised coordination should be strengthened to improve operations and measures, and ultimately augment judicial capacity in rendering protection.
   Thus, based on the local cultural characteristics and development of the local cultural industry, the high people’s courts of Tianjin, Inner Mongolia, Hubei, Guangdong, Guangxi and Sichuan have issued specific rules of implementation for providing judicial protection of intellectual property to facilitate development and prosperity of our socialist culture. The rules were formulated to strengthen intellectual property protection in the cultural sector, enable development of the traditional cultural sector, and provide impetus for growth of emerging creative industries. The high people’s courts of Hunan and Shanxi have developed rules of implementation for judicial protection and service for building an innovative economy, which tailored to the local state of socioeconomic development. This would drive innovation and development of science and technology, as well as strategic restructuring of the economy.

总共25页  [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] 10 [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] 
上一页  下一页  

相关法规:
·2012年中国法院知识产权司法保护状况(中文) / 最高人民法院(2013-4-22)
·最高人民法院办公厅印发2012年中国法院知识产权司法保护10大案件、10大创新性案件和50... / 最高人民法院办公厅(2013-4-15)
·中国法院知识产权司法保护状况(2011年) / 最高人民法院(2012-4-18)
·最高人民法院办公厅关于印发2011年中国法院知识产权司法保护10大案件和50件典型案例的通知 / 最高人民法院办公厅(2012-4-11)
·最高人民法院办公厅关于印发2010年中国法院知识产权司法保护10大案件和50件典型案例的通知 / 最高人民法院办公厅(2011-4-18)
·最高人民法院关于印发《中国法院知识产权司法保护状况(2010年)》的通知 / 最高人民法院(2011-4-12)
·中国法院知识产权司法保护状况(2009年) / 最高人民法院(2010-4-21)
·最高人民法院关于印发2009年中国法院知识产权司法保护10大案件和50件典型案例的通知 / 最高人民法院(2010-4-14)
·中国知识产权司法保护纲要(2016-2020) / 最高人民法院(2017-4-20)
===============================
声明:本法规由《法律图书馆》网站
(http://www.law-lib.com)免费提供.
仅供学术研究参考使用,
请与正式出版物或发文原件核对后使用。
===============================
手机法律图书馆>>导航>>搜索