证券虚假陈述侵权责任中信赖推定之证成——欺诈市场理论局限性的克服/于莹(9)
当然,我们也会注意到存在明知证券虚假陈述又以证券虚假陈述为由请求损害赔偿的情况,这是出尔反尔、背弃诚信的行为,如果被告能够予以证明,原告的请求自不应获得支持。
注释:
[1]于莹.证券法中的民事责任[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2004.
[2] Jonathan R. Macey. The Fraud on the Market Theory:Some Preliminary Issues[J]. Cornell Law Review,1989,(74).
[3]焦津洪.“欺诈市场理论”研究[J].中国法学,2003,(2).
[4]张月飞,史震涛,陈耀光.香港与大陆股市有效性比较研究[J].金融研究,2006,(6).
[5]陈娟.对中国股市有效性及波动性的实证检验[J].企业导报,2009,(3).
[6] Benjamin C. Zipursky. Rights,Wrongs,and Recourse in the Law ofTorts[J]. VanderbiltLaw Review,1998,(1).
[7] John C. P. Goldberg. The Constitutional Status of TortLaw:Due Process and theRight to a Law for the Redress of Wrongs[J]. Yale Law Journa,l 2005,(7).
[8] [英] H. L. A.哈特.法律的概念[M].张文显等译.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1996
[9] John C. P. Goldberg,Anthony J. Sebok,Benjamin C. Zipursky. The Place of Reliance in Fraud[J]. Arizona Law Review,2006,(4).
[10]蔡立东.公司自治论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2006.
[11] Zohar Goshen,Gideon Parchomovsky. The Essential Role of Securities Regulation[J]. Duke Law Journa,l 2006,(1).
[12] [德]卡尔·拉伦茨.法学方法论[M].陈爱娥译.北京:商务印书馆,2003.
[13] Nicholas L. Georgakopoulos. Frauds,Markets,and Fraud-on-the-Market:The Tortured Transition of Justifiable Reliance from Deceit to Securities Fraud[J]. University of MiamiLaw Review,1995,(2).
总共10页
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] 9
[10] 上一页 下一页