中美两国反垄断起诉资格比较研究/陈承堂(13)
[12][13][14][15][16][26]See Standing to Sue for Treble Damages Under Section 4 of the Clayton Act,64 Colum. L. Rev.,1964.
[17][18][41][49][71]See Kathleen Chouai,Discharged Employees and Treble Damages:The Outer Limits of“Antitrust Injury”,44 U. Pitt. L.Rev.,1983.
[19]参见李俊峰:《反垄断法的私人实施》,中国法制出版社2009年版,第175页。
[20]赖源河编审:《公平交易法新论》,中国政法大学出版社、元照出版社2002年版,第433页。
[21][52]曾世雄:《损害赔偿法原理》,中国政法大学出版社2001年版,第56页,第185页。
[24]See Joseph L. Alioto & Peter J. Donnici,Standing Requirements for Antitrust Plaintiffs:Judicially Created Exceptions to a Clear Statutory Policy,4 U.S.F.L. Rev. 1970.
[25][27][28][35]See Daniel Berger & Roger Bernstein,An Analytical Framework for Antitrust Standing,86 Yale L.J.,1977.
[29]ee Ames v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.,166 F. 820,822-824(C.C.D. Mass. 1909);Loeb v. Eastman Kodak Co.,183 F. 704 (3d Cir. 1910).
[30]See Loeb v. Eastman Kodak Co.,183 F. 704 (3d Cir. 1910).
[31][79]See Antitrust Injury and Standing:A Question of Legal Cause,67 Minn. L. Rev.,1983.
[32][33]See Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois,431 U.S. 720 (1977).
总共16页
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] 13
[14] [15] [16] 上一页 下一页