法律图书馆>>法律论文资料库>>全文
美国上市公司股东提案适当议题制度及其启示/王敏(9)
[4]See James Hamilton,1998 SEC Proxy Reform:Shareholder Proposals,Chicago:CCH Incorporated,1998,p. 13
[5][19]SEC,Proposed Amendments to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Relating to Proposals by Security Holder,Release No. 34-12598 (July 7,1976).
[6][26]See Amy L. Goodman,John F. Olson,A Practical Guide to SEC Proxy and Compensation Rules,Aspen Law&Business,4th ed.,2007,p.14-59,p.14-33.
[7]See American Federation of State,County&Municipal Employees v. American Intern. Group, Inc.,462 F.3d 121 (2d Cir. 2006).
[8]See SEC,Facilitating Shareholder Director Nominations,Securities Act Release No. 9046 (June 10,2009).
[9][27]See Martin,The Effect of Shareholder Proposals on Executive Compensation,67 U. Cin. L.Rev. 1021 (1999):1045-1046,1048-1049.
[10]John M. Bizjak and Christopher J. Marquette,Are Shareholder Proposals All Bark and No Bite?Evidence from Shareholder Resolutions to Rescind Poison Pills,The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,Vol. 33,No. 4 (Dec.,1998):502.
[11]See 1990 SEC No-Act. LEXIS 89.


总共11页     [1]   [2]   [3]   [4]   [5]   [6]   [7]   [8]   9   [10]   [11]  
上一页     下一页    

声明:本论文由《法律图书馆》网站收藏,
仅供学术研究参考使用,
版权为原作者所有,未经作者同意,不得转载。
法律图书馆>>法律论文资料库