《涉外民事关系法律适用法》第42条评析/于颖(10)
[28]See T．C．Hartley，Mandatory Rules in International Contracts：The Conlmon Law Approach，Collected Courses of The Hague AcademyofIntemationalLaw266．Martinus NijhoffPublishers，1997，p．345．
[29]See D．F．Cavers，“Habitual Residence”：A Useful Concept？，21 Am．U．L．Rev．1971-1972，pp．475-478．
[30]参见前注[26]，Hans-W．Micklitz等主编书，第267页。
[31]参见前注[25]，C．Lima Marques书，第145-190。
[32]See N．Reich，Consumerism and Citizenship in the Information Society-The Case ofElectronic Contracting，inT．Willlelms－son（ed．），Consumer Law in the Information Society，Kluwer，La Haye／London/Boston，2001，p．170．
[33]参见1980年罗马公约第5条第2款。
[34]OAS Brazilian Proposal, Inter-American Convention on the Law Applicable to International Consumer Contracts and Trans-actions. Arts. 4 and 5.
[35]See H. Kronke，Applicable Law in Torts and Contracts in Cyberspace, in K. B. Woelki and C. Kessedjian,（eds.），Inter-net-Which Court Decides？ Which Law Applies？ Kluwer, London, 1998，p. 82.
[36]See 1980 Rome Convention, Art. 5 (2)．
[37]See S. C. Symeomdes，Choice of Law in the American Courts in 2005：Nineteenth Annual Survey, 54 Am. J. Comp. L.623，2005.
总共11页
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] 10
[11] 上一页 下一页