法律图书馆>>法律论文资料库>>全文
澳大利亚行政优劣性审查制度/沈开举(21)

[16]Re Waterford v Director General of Social Services(1980)3 ALD 63.

[17]Re Keane v Australian Postal Commission(1977),1 ALD 53.

[18]数据来源为 AAT Annual Report 2010 - 2011,24[table 3.9].

[19]Douglas,Douglas and Jones’s Administrative Law,289.

[20]Re Ganchov v Comcare (1990)19 ALD 541.

[21]AAT Act(Cth),s.44(1).

[22]在 114 起上诉案件中,有 93 起案件是依照《联邦行政上诉裁判所法案》第 44 条提起的,另外 21 起是依据其他法案提起的。SeeAAT,Annual Report 2010 - 2011,18&25.

[23]Croker v Secretary Department of Employment and Workplace Relations [2006] FCA 1257;VCAT Act(Vic),s.3&148.

[24]Cf Alcoa of Australia Ltd v Swiss Aluminum Australia(1985)9 ALD 345;Australian Postal Commission v Hayes(1989)87 ALR 283 esp at 288;Bogaards v McMahon(1988)80 ALR342,348ff.

[25]Pancontinental Mining Ltd v Burns (1994)124 ALR 471esp,483.

[26]Bittmann v Australian Securities and Investments Commission(No 2)[2006] FCA 1786.

[27]Politis v Federal Commissioner of Taxation(1986)16 ALF 707 at 708;Commissioner of Taxation v A Taxpayer (2006)91 ALD 335,343.



总共24页     [1]   [2]   [3]   [4]   [5]   [6]   [7]   [8]   [9]   [10]   [11]   [12]   [13]   [14]   [15]   [16]   [17]   [18]   [19]   [20]   21   [22]   [23]   [24]  
上一页     下一页    

声明:本论文由《法律图书馆》网站收藏,
仅供学术研究参考使用,
版权为原作者所有,未经作者同意,不得转载。
法律图书馆>>法律论文资料库