法律图书馆>>法律论文资料库>>全文
澳大利亚行政优劣性审查制度/沈开举(23)

[35]Brandy v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission(1995)183 CLR 245;Attorney - General(Cth)v Breckler (1999),197 CLR 83.

[36]Attorney - General(Cth)v Breckler(1999),197 CLR 83,110.

[37]See Peter Cane,“Judicial Review and Merits Review:Comparing Administrative Adjudication by Courts and Tribunals“,in Susan Rose -Ackerman and Peter L Lindseth(ed.),Comparative Administrative Law,(Edward Elgar Publishing,Cheltenham,UK,2011),426 - 448.

[38]AAT Act(Cth),s.33(1)(b).

[39]Griffiths in Arguments(ed),Administrative Law,ALAL Inc.,1996,24.

[40]Henchliffe,“Theory,Practice and Procedural Fairness at Administrative Appeals,Tribunal Hearings”,Australian Bar Review 13 (1995 ):248.

[41]Bedford N& Creyke R,Inquisitorial v Adversarial Processes in Australian Tribunals,in Finn C(ed):Shapping Administrative Law for the Next Generation:Fresh Perspectives,papers presented at the 2004 National Administrative Law Forum(Australia),91.

[42]Lane and Young,Administrative Law in Australia,191.

[43]Ibid.,69 - 70.


总共24页     [1]   [2]   [3]   [4]   [5]   [6]   [7]   [8]   [9]   [10]   [11]   [12]   [13]   [14]   [15]   [16]   [17]   [18]   [19]   [20]   [21]   [22]   23   [24]  
上一页     下一页    

声明:本论文由《法律图书馆》网站收藏,
仅供学术研究参考使用,
版权为原作者所有,未经作者同意,不得转载。
法律图书馆>>法律论文资料库