海上货物运输法的历史发展及其启示/张文广(10)
历史总在重复上演。在对《鹿特丹规则》的热情消退之后，我们发现，公约的前景似乎并不乐观，其不能生效或不能迅速生效的后果似乎也没有多么可怕。实力决定规则，这是残酷的国际现实。就我国而言，我国尚不具备独立引领制定海运公约的实力，维持现状也许更符合我国的国家利益，“等待和观望”未尝不是一个明智的选择。
【注释】
[1] Michael F. Sturley: The History of COGSA and the Hague Rules, 22 J. Mar. L. & Com. 1 1991.
[2]傅廷中.海商法论［Ｍ］.北京：法律出版社，2007:202.FU Ting-zhong. Maritime law[M].Beijing: Law Press,2007:202.（in Chinese）
[3]Frederick Green: The Harter Act, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 16, No.3. (Jan., 1903), pp. 157-177.
[4]Robert Force: Admiralty and Maritime Law, Federal Judicial Center, 2004, pp58-59.
[5]Joseph C. Sweeney: Happy Birthday, Harter: A Reappraisal of the Harter Act on its 100th Anniversary. 24 J. Mar. L. & Com. 1 1993.
[6]杨良宜.提单及其他付运单证（修订版）［Ｍ］.北京：中国政法大学出版社，2007:322.YANG Liang-yi. Bill of lading and other shipping document[M].Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press,2007:322.（in Chinese）.
[7]CMI. Yearbook 2010 [J], 2010:575-576.
[8]David Frederick: Political Participation and Legal Reform in the International Maritime Rulemaking Process: From the Hague Rules to the Hamburg Rules, 22 J. Mar. L. & Com. 81 1991.
总共13页
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] 10
[11] [12] [13] 上一页 下一页