保险法中的疑义利益解释原则/孙宏涛(9)
[3]Jeffrey W. Stempel, Interpretation of Insurance Contract, Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1994，p.518.
[4]Mark C. Rahdert, Reasonable Expectations Revisited, Connecticut Insurance Law Journal, 1998, v. 5，pp.112—113.
[5]《法国民法典》英译本第1162条原文为In case of doubt, an agreement shall be interpreted against the one who has stipulated, and in fa your of the one who has contracted the obligation.
[6]参见程兵、严志凌：《论保险合同条款的不利解释原则》，载《法学》2004年第9期。
[7]参见徐卫东：《商法基本问题研究》，法律出版社2002年版，第355页。
[8]参见樊启荣：《保险合同“疑义利益解释”之解释—对〈保险法〉第30条的目的解释和限缩解释》，载《法商研究》2002年第4期。江朝国：《保险法基础理论》，中国政法大学出版社2002年版，第38页。
[9]Jeffrey R. Pawelski, Insurers Don' t Need the Court to "Babysit" Them: an Argument for Reasonable Expectations in American Family Mutual Insurance Co.v．Elliot, South Dakota Law Review, 1996, v. 41，pp. 375—376.
[10]Robert E. Keeton＆Alan I. Widiss, Insurance Law, West Publishing Co.，1988, p.12.
[11]前引[2]David S. Miller文，p. 1854.
[12]Bradley D. Liggett, Contra Applicantem or Contra Proferentem Applicatio ： the Need Forclanfication of the Doctrine of Contra Proferentem in The Context of Insured-Created Ambiguities in Insurance Applications，Brigham Young University Law Review, 2008, v. 1, pp. 222—223.
总共11页
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] 9
[10] [11] 上一页 下一页