航空运输合同研究/张昭辉(4)
The unification of international airway transportation law is the trend this era; the “Warsaw system” is the corner stone of which. It contributed in voucher unification and carrier’s civil obligation by defining the international airway transportation and unifying voucher, contract condition and complain fairs. China civil aviation laws absorbed parts of this system but decided to hold lower criteria
The airway transportation contract become effective provided that the participants get common agreement, then offering and accepting, then paying counter price and provide legal transportation voucher. Contract must be confirmed by certain legal process and finished when the carried item get to destination. Any reasonable amendment or stop will not be sourced to the fulfilled part of the noted contract and the contradictory rights are reserved
Compensation or indemnity issues are regulated by Chinese “Contract law” clause no.113 that the indemnity is limited in a reasonable extent in terms of physical damage. The “Warsaw system” considers that the carrier’s obligation must be tracked according to his fault as a precondition, supposed fault and converse quoting are two methods. “Warsaw system” estimates three forms of obligation: customer physical damage, cargo theft or damage and Mora.
总共48页
[1] [2] [3] 4
[5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] 上一页 下一页