仲裁与调解相结合正当性解读/周成泓(7)
[7] Michael E. Schneider, Combining Arbitration with Conciliation, ICCA Congress Series no.8,ibid.,p.76.
[8] Street Laurence, The Language Dispute Resolution (1992) 66 Australia Law Journal,194,p.197.
[9] Goldberg, Green and Sander,Dispute Resolution,pp.246-267.
[10] David C. Elliott, Med-Arb: Fraught with Danger or Ripe with Opportunity? 62 Arbitration (August 1996),p.177.
[11] Roger Pitchforth, National Report-New Zealand, speech delivered at the Nagoya Symposiun,ibid,pp.411 and 432.
[12] [日]棚濑孝雄.纠纷的解决与审判制度[M].王亚新译,北京：中国政法大学出版社,1996,27-35,107－108,80,104.
[13] 同上,107-108.
[14] 同上,80,104.
[15] 季卫东.法治秩序的建构[M].北京：法律出版社,1999,385.
[16] 陈瑞华.程序正义初论[ A].陈光中,江伟.诉讼法论丛（第一卷）[C].北京：法律出版社,1998.
[17] 陈桂明.程序理念与程序规则[M].北京：中国法制出版社,1999,2.
On Rationality of Arb-Med
ZHOU Cheng-hong
(South West University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 400031)
Abstract: The article deals with the definition of arb-med, then analyzes the pro-viewpoints and con-viewpoints, pointing out that there are three focus of the argumentation about it ,i.e.due process and efficiency .Finally the article introduces the “acquirement of dual agreement”theory and applies it for demonstrating the rationality of arb-med.
总共8页
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] 7
[8] 上一页 下一页