二十一世纪的美国行政法/黄忠 译(19)
[32] 通常可参见：William Funk, Bargaining Toward the New Millennium: Regulatory Negotiation and the Subversion of the Public Interest,46 Duke L.J.1351(1997)（因会使行政机关削弱对公共利益的考虑而对协商性法规制定作了批评）；William Funk, When Smoke Gets in Your Eyes: Regulatory Negotiation and the Public Interest-EPA’s Woodstove Standards, 18 Emvtl. L.55(1987)（强调说协商性法规制定模式只能会使行政机关沦为帮助利益相关人达成合意的促进者，且会引起行政机关超越法定权限行为的危险。）；但也有相反的观点，如Philip J. Harter, Assessing the Assessors: The Actual Performance of Negotiated Rulemaking. 9 N.Y.U. Envtl. L.J.32(2002)（简述了行政协商的优点）。
[33] 见Lewis A. Kornhauser, On Justifying Cost-Benefit Analysis. 29 J. Legal Stud. 1037, 1054(2000)；但也有相反的观点，见Exec. Order No. 12,866, 3 C.F.R. 638(1994), reprinted in 5 U.S.C. § 601 (2000)（旨在言明成本效益分析法的不足）。
[34] 见Margret Catde, Can Bambi Ride Herd over Godzilla? The Role of Esecutive Oversight in EPA’s Rulemaking for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, 36 Nat. Resources J. 643, 675-76 & n.248(1996)（鉴于国会的核废物政策，作者认为OMB对EPA的监管不仅没能澄清反而模糊了其在政治上所负的说明责任。）；又见Erik D. Olson, The Quiet Shift of Power: Office of Management & Budget Supervision of Envi-Resources L.1, 28-35, 55-57(1984)（认为OMB对EPA法规的审查既没能增进行政机关的说明义务，也没能促进强有力的分析。）。.
总共29页
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] 19
[20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] 上一页 下一页