二十一世纪的美国行政法/黄忠 译(20)
[35] 通常可参考：Ian Ayres & John Brathwaite. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate (1992);以及Stewart, 同前注[30] at 27-38。
[36] Mark Seidenfeld, Demystifying Deossification; Rethinking Recent Proposals to Modify Judicial Review of Notice and Comment Rulemaking, 75 Tex. L. Rev. 483, 483-84(1997)（由于不必要的分析障碍，行政法上旨在扩大公众参与的新发展已不经意地阻碍了法规的制定。）。
[37] 见Stewart, 同前注[30]， at 27-38。
[38] 见 Regulatory Encounters: Multinational Corporations and American Adversary Legalism 404-05(Robert A. Kagan & Lee Axelrad eds., 2000); Richard B. Stewart, Recon-stitutive Law, 46 Md. L. Rev. 86, 103-04(1986)。
[39] Jody Freeman, Collaborative Governance in the Administrative State, 45 UCLA L. Rev.1, 5, 18-19(1997) (提出对抗性的代表程序会导致法规制定的延缓、僵化和缺乏创新性。)。
[40] 见 Seidenfeld, 同前注[36]， at 483 ( “僵化”是指行政机关在采用新法规之前由于须首先清除分析上的障碍，从而使得管理方案缺乏效率)；又见Thomas O. McGarity, Some Thoughts on “Deossifying” the Rulemaking Process, 41 Duke L.J. 1385, 1387-1436(1992)（概述了“僵化”的原因和后果）；Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Seven Ways to Deossify Agency Rulemaking, 47 Admin. L. Rev. 59, 60-66(1995) (同样简述了“僵化”的原因和后果)。
总共29页
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] 20
[21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] 上一页 下一页