法学论文/杨日旭(9)
④ 该市政府之规定非在限制“意见之沟通”(communication of ideas)之自由,而系合理保障他人不受干涉之权利(a reasonable protection from distraction亦即他人之隐私权必须加以尊重;)
⑤ 言论自由在公共秩序维护人员无法加以保护的时间与情况之下,将成为有名无实的空洞字眼(“The right to speak one’s mind would often be an empty privilege in a place and at a time beyond the protecting hand of the guardians of public order.”);
⑥ 因为任何人在家中或街上都无法逃避扩音器对其隐私权之干扰,除非经由市政府予以保护;(“In his homeon or on the street he is practically helpless to escape this interference with his privacy by loud speakers except through the protection of the municipality.”)
⑦ 因此,“本院认为议会得行使其裁量权制定规程禁止装有扩音器之卡车在市街道通道加高音量,大声向公众广播。在十二万五千人口的春腾市的市区中,这种喧杂噪音将危害交通及传播信讯的有用时间,而且将使居民所向往的住宅区的宁静和听由宗教、社会或政治说教来摆布”(“We think it is a permissible exercise of legislative discretion to bar sound truck with baroadcasts of public interest, amplified to a loud and raucous volume, from the public ways of municipalities. On the business streets of cities like Trenton, with its more than 125,000 people such distraction would be dangerous to traffic at all hours useful for the dissemination of information, and in the residential throughfares the quiet and tranquility so desirable for city dwellers would likewise be at the mercy of advocates of particular religious, social or political persuasion.”)
总共18页
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] 9
[10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] 上一页 下一页