历史性所有权视野下的中越北部湾划界与南海争端比较/窦希铭
历史性所有权视野下的中越北部湾划界与南海争端比较
窦希铭
【摘要】
以《联合国海洋法公约》为代表的现代海洋法制度确定了海洋自由的原则,海洋——除领海以外——原本不能成为国家主权的客体,“历史性所有权”之所以为现代海洋法所承认根本上是基于普遍的国际承认。在南海,岛屿主权争端与海域划界争端交织在一起,错综复杂。借助对“历史性所有权”的概念的分析以及与中越北部湾划界的比较,可以为走出南海困局铺垫一条可行的出路。
【关键字】
历史性所有权;历史性水域;南海问题
A Comparative Study on the South China Sea Dispute and Sino-Vietnam Beibu Gulf Maritime Delimitation Under the View of Historical Sovereignty
Abstract: The modern law of the sea system represented by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea established the principle of freedom of the seas. The seas (territorial seas excluded) were originally not the objects of state sovereignty, and that the “historical sovereignty” being recognized by the modern law of the sea is fundamentally based on the universal international recognition. In the South China Sea, the coexitence of the disputes of the sovereignty of islands and the sea boder delimitation makes it very complicated. Through the analysis of the concept of “historical sovereignty”, we may find an available access to the South China Sea predicament.
总共5页 1
[2] [3] [4] [5] 下一页